<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Wave to Buzz to Google&#8217;s dominion over the social sphere</title>
	<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the social media revolution</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dominion card game</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>dominion card game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>I loved as much as you'll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved as much as you&#8217;ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: security tool virus removal</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>security tool virus removal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 03:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>Hello from Russia! Should it be easy for me to pages and use a submit inside your weblog with the link to you? I’ve tried emailing you regarding this issue nonetheless it looks i cant achieve you, please response as soon as have a moment, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello from Russia! Should it be easy for me to pages and use a submit inside your weblog with the link to you? I’ve tried emailing you regarding this issue nonetheless it looks i cant achieve you, please response as soon as have a moment, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pdf To Word Converters</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Pdf To Word Converters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Hi. I read a couple of of this other posts and needed to understand in the event you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I read a couple of of this other posts and needed to understand in the event you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajithkumar CC</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajithkumar CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.
Thanks
Ajithkumar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.<br />
Thanks<br />
Ajithkumar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clickflick</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Clickflick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>I had used Wave before to learn and showcase with other(s) from my Twitter stream. It was very confusing when we had over 10 or so people. When it was like 4-6 people it seemed more seamless. I think it's great for editing a single piece document (article) but for a mutiple page (50pg pdf) I don't think it will work so well. I like the concept but might use has tailed off on in until Google fixes the lags especially on the 3rd party apps for Wave on the iphone. It works for some people. I'll probably give it a try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had used Wave before to learn and showcase with other(s) from my Twitter stream. It was very confusing when we had over 10 or so people. When it was like 4-6 people it seemed more seamless. I think it&#8217;s great for editing a single piece document (article) but for a mutiple page (50pg pdf) I don&#8217;t think it will work so well. I like the concept but might use has tailed off on in until Google fixes the lags especially on the 3rd party apps for Wave on the iphone. It works for some people. I&#8217;ll probably give it a try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%.  Anything that starts with "G" and ends with "oogle" demands our attention.  You are a wonderful writer. Just do it more often! : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%.  Anything that starts with &#8220;G&#8221; and ends with &#8220;oogle&#8221; demands our attention.  You are a wonderful writer. Just do it more often! : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Fiore</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Great discussion to yet another brilliant post by Autom!  

As I was writing this comment, I tried to think back to the way Google claimed its relevance through domination.  If we look at Wave as an application, it would be made most relevant on a "corporate" platform, but there are a few misses with the way you need a Gmail account to send an invite or login.   While Gmail has become ubiquitous for "personal" uses, I can't see there being enough elements to draw in the business crowd, especially if they have to make a case to use "social toys" in the workplace, much less register for a free email account. 

The next question to ask - how does Wave and Buzz measure-up against its search and alert properties?  Will the right recipe for success require a dash of an acquired property to bring relevance to GOOG-baked goods, or will  it suffice for Wave to add whiteboards and desktop sharing features to usher in the throng of corporate?  My hunch is not anywhere near the way its attained its search and alert dominance, and it will take more than a few features to overcome the laggard mentalities that are deeply entrenched in the privacy and security costs with freeware.  

Reserving some thought to Autom's and Biz Stone's "mobile DNA", and coupling that idea with the announcement of &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/02/AR2010030203916.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;iPhone suing HTC&lt;/a&gt;, I can't help wonder if Wave was just a staked claim to protect its ideas for Buzz - or for something bigger and more fitting to defend and affirm its position as search despot ;)

Joseph
@RepuTrack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great discussion to yet another brilliant post by Autom!  </p>
<p>As I was writing this comment, I tried to think back to the way Google claimed its relevance through domination.  If we look at Wave as an application, it would be made most relevant on a &#8220;corporate&#8221; platform, but there are a few misses with the way you need a Gmail account to send an invite or login.   While Gmail has become ubiquitous for &#8220;personal&#8221; uses, I can&#8217;t see there being enough elements to draw in the business crowd, especially if they have to make a case to use &#8220;social toys&#8221; in the workplace, much less register for a free email account. </p>
<p>The next question to ask - how does Wave and Buzz measure-up against its search and alert properties?  Will the right recipe for success require a dash of an acquired property to bring relevance to GOOG-baked goods, or will  it suffice for Wave to add whiteboards and desktop sharing features to usher in the throng of corporate?  My hunch is not anywhere near the way its attained its search and alert dominance, and it will take more than a few features to overcome the laggard mentalities that are deeply entrenched in the privacy and security costs with freeware.  </p>
<p>Reserving some thought to Autom&#8217;s and Biz Stone&#8217;s &#8220;mobile DNA&#8221;, and coupling that idea with the announcement of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/02/AR2010030203916.html" rel="nofollow">iPhone suing HTC</a>, I can&#8217;t help wonder if Wave was just a staked claim to protect its ideas for Buzz - or for something bigger and more fitting to defend and affirm its position as search despot <img src='http://autom.x.iabc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Joseph<br />
@RepuTrack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autom Tagsa</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Autom Tagsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 06:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Christina - always happy to share observations..we could have in fact gone into more detail (e.g., when someone is typing their name appears beside the cursor, if they're pausing or still in typing mode the hi-lited name reamins visible, it's a cue to wait.. when you type an URL out it automatically activates the link for you much like Word, etc.) we could have also delved more into details on the WYSIWYG tool for the text editor etc. but i figured ppl would figure it out eventually..practice makes perfect, right? : ) 

Alasdair - so glad you found this useful...one of my objectives with this post is not only to bring down the Wave experience to the everyday user but also remind people about the  beta experience, that Wave is an open source product that is in constant development etc., and with that context, perhaps encourage others to give it another whirl to see its potential

Aaron - yes, there is an excess of social tools out there and betas always gets a bad rap when not well received by the average user. but per our wave just now (haha) online social tools designed with specific collaborative functionalities require more than your average controlled beta test group..so perhaps the order of the day is indeed to push out to the hyped up public and see what bugs they can find..no comment on FaceShmook (as you know I have a special place in the cold room storage--  i mean in the back of my head, for that one)...the GOOG/Skynet comparison is certainly nothing new and something I find somewhat humorous at this point..location based apps to me is like deploying do-it-yourself programs that will entice an unwitting public to do all the cartographic work as they ping locations left right and center as if plotting out coordinates and confirming  they match with GPS readings (and other revenue-tied MO's i won't even get into)..ho hum..and certainly the privacy factor is something an average, "social star struck" user wouldn't even pause to consider as long as they manage to become mayor of a bus stop..

BUT..and we all know this..we are in the midst of the burgeoning mobile age..as Biz Stone once said "mobile has always been part of Twitter's DNA" (or something to this effect) this was quite telling for me when I first came across that comment.. in my mind, the shift is happening so blatantly, and as the leveled, democratized approach gains full momentum we see social channels expand, access become increasingly easy and the insane drive to achieve the most ubiquitous experience realized at every conceivable scenario..but at what cost? so many other delicate, subtle elements are left unchecked (e.g.,privacy, security, etc.)

remember what they say about having too much of a good thing..and we all know who "they" are now don't we? haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina - always happy to share observations..we could have in fact gone into more detail (e.g., when someone is typing their name appears beside the cursor, if they&#8217;re pausing or still in typing mode the hi-lited name reamins visible, it&#8217;s a cue to wait.. when you type an URL out it automatically activates the link for you much like Word, etc.) we could have also delved more into details on the WYSIWYG tool for the text editor etc. but i figured ppl would figure it out eventually..practice makes perfect, right? : ) </p>
<p>Alasdair - so glad you found this useful&#8230;one of my objectives with this post is not only to bring down the Wave experience to the everyday user but also remind people about the  beta experience, that Wave is an open source product that is in constant development etc., and with that context, perhaps encourage others to give it another whirl to see its potential</p>
<p>Aaron - yes, there is an excess of social tools out there and betas always gets a bad rap when not well received by the average user. but per our wave just now (haha) online social tools designed with specific collaborative functionalities require more than your average controlled beta test group..so perhaps the order of the day is indeed to push out to the hyped up public and see what bugs they can find..no comment on FaceShmook (as you know I have a special place in the cold room storage&#8211;  i mean in the back of my head, for that one)&#8230;the GOOG/Skynet comparison is certainly nothing new and something I find somewhat humorous at this point..location based apps to me is like deploying do-it-yourself programs that will entice an unwitting public to do all the cartographic work as they ping locations left right and center as if plotting out coordinates and confirming  they match with GPS readings (and other revenue-tied MO&#8217;s i won&#8217;t even get into)..ho hum..and certainly the privacy factor is something an average, &#8220;social star struck&#8221; user wouldn&#8217;t even pause to consider as long as they manage to become mayor of a bus stop..</p>
<p>BUT..and we all know this..we are in the midst of the burgeoning mobile age..as Biz Stone once said &#8220;mobile has always been part of Twitter&#8217;s DNA&#8221; (or something to this effect) this was quite telling for me when I first came across that comment.. in my mind, the shift is happening so blatantly, and as the leveled, democratized approach gains full momentum we see social channels expand, access become increasingly easy and the insane drive to achieve the most ubiquitous experience realized at every conceivable scenario..but at what cost? so many other delicate, subtle elements are left unchecked (e.g.,privacy, security, etc.)</p>
<p>remember what they say about having too much of a good thing..and we all know who &#8220;they&#8221; are now don&#8217;t we? haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Friedman</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>No doubt another great post Autom! Props to Charlotte and Joseph for all the research as well.... I have to admit, like Alasdair, I just had to just dust off my Wave account after reading your post. Funny, how I was all stoked about Wave for the months following the developer conference and quickly brushed it aside after a few months of play. When I take a step back and ask why did Wave not catch on... I think it comes down to some of the many reasons people have been playing down Buzz... as not too many peeps in the socialverse are "not" wanting to add yet another social tool to their cluttered tool box!

Don't get me wrong... I love the potential of Wave and what it will eventually evolve into with help from the developer community. However, I still don't see Wave gaining any traction on a consumer level. Wave's potential is as an enterprise product. GOOG should just add it to their existing list of Apps and call it a day! Example: Social CRM... Look at the time and money being invested by Salesforce.com on Chatter (great looking tool), although I am still trying to figure out why the CEO just recently compared the future of CRM to a controlled, refined version of Facebook (little scary)??? Now, I can't say I agree with that thought process as Facebook is the definition of complete noise and social distortion... but I do however see GOOG's Wave platform as a sweet baseline to build social CRM tools with (especially open source CRM). 

Who knows.... If GOOG can overcome all the privacy issues and stop being information whores, than perhaps products like Buzz may have a chance to take-off and not crash and burn before even getting started. Personally, Skynet scares the bejesus out of me... Don't even get me started on how location Apps like Buzz with Maps 4.0 are going to open the door to stalkers and all physcos in general... Parents will now have to warn their children to turn off the LBS (Location Based Service) feature in their phone before leaving the house! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt another great post Autom! Props to Charlotte and Joseph for all the research as well&#8230;. I have to admit, like Alasdair, I just had to just dust off my Wave account after reading your post. Funny, how I was all stoked about Wave for the months following the developer conference and quickly brushed it aside after a few months of play. When I take a step back and ask why did Wave not catch on&#8230; I think it comes down to some of the many reasons people have been playing down Buzz&#8230; as not too many peeps in the socialverse are &#8220;not&#8221; wanting to add yet another social tool to their cluttered tool box!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230; I love the potential of Wave and what it will eventually evolve into with help from the developer community. However, I still don&#8217;t see Wave gaining any traction on a consumer level. Wave&#8217;s potential is as an enterprise product. GOOG should just add it to their existing list of Apps and call it a day! Example: Social CRM&#8230; Look at the time and money being invested by Salesforce.com on Chatter (great looking tool), although I am still trying to figure out why the CEO just recently compared the future of CRM to a controlled, refined version of Facebook (little scary)??? Now, I can&#8217;t say I agree with that thought process as Facebook is the definition of complete noise and social distortion&#8230; but I do however see GOOG&#8217;s Wave platform as a sweet baseline to build social CRM tools with (especially open source CRM). </p>
<p>Who knows&#8230;. If GOOG can overcome all the privacy issues and stop being information whores, than perhaps products like Buzz may have a chance to take-off and not crash and burn before even getting started. Personally, Skynet scares the bejesus out of me&#8230; Don&#8217;t even get me started on how location Apps like Buzz with Maps 4.0 are going to open the door to stalkers and all physcos in general&#8230; Parents will now have to warn their children to turn off the LBS (Location Based Service) feature in their phone before leaving the house! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair Munn</title>
		<link>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autom.x.iabc.com/2010/03/02/from-wave-to-buzz-to-googles-dominion-over-the-social-sphere/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>This is actually useful. Thank you Autom, Charlotte and Joseph for putting in the hours and the research. Seldom do I feel altered by this type of post, yet today I am dusting off my Google wave and giving it a second chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually useful. Thank you Autom, Charlotte and Joseph for putting in the hours and the research. Seldom do I feel altered by this type of post, yet today I am dusting off my Google wave and giving it a second chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

