Comments on: Twitter Lists: courtesy, classification, trust

By: Donell

Donell — Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:43:17 +0000

Autom, I joined Twitter after seeing a bumpersticker telling me it was a “Twitter thing” that I wouldn’t understand. Thanks for your blogs. They’ve helped.

By: Autom Tagsa

Autom Tagsa — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:18:16 +0000

wow this entry is getting its fair share of spam - gotta love the faceshmook zynga comment and ramirez’s ‘drivel’
advice to bloggers: check your comment streams often for SPAM - there are some pretty clever ones out there and i am retaining a few as examples

By: Raphael Caleb Ramirez

Raphael Caleb Ramirez — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:00:15 +0000

Possibly I am not helpful enough, or I just have no idea the best way to market myself personally but I truly cannot get hold of any kind of followers. I’ve tried following individuals to get a warm and friendly follow back, assists to some degree but it just appears everybody who does that wants the identical detail as me, someone to browse their day by day drivel.

By: facebook zynga

facebook zynga — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:54 +0000

hah most of the observations people put up are a bit spacey, in many instances i think about whether they honestly read the articles or blog posts and items before placing a comment or if perhaps they simply look at the titles and write only the first thought that pops into their heads. in either case, it really is nice to read through smart commentary occasionally in contrast to the exact same, classic oppinion vomit that i more often than not see on the internet

By: Autom Tagsa

Autom Tagsa — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:53:34 +0000

@laurieanderson ok maybe not ‘the’ laurie anderson but a great example of spam-in-cheek

@bryn great to tweet with you today too - thanks for stopping n sharing..er…shopping and staring? (funny that)

By: Bryna

Bryna — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:40:12 +0000

Great post! I think you’re totally right re: influence. There’s no way to measure if the number of lists you’re on correlates with your online influence. Yes, numbers tell a story — I would suggest that the more followers you have, the more lists you’ll appear on, and that relates (to an extent) to influence (pretty obvious). However, I think lists are more for the individual creating the list. There are few that I follow, even when I’m listed. I do try to thank people when they think of me though. I definitely appreciate when people list me. However, I use my lists to organize myself. I don’t do a great job; I have two and really only use one, but the one I use is really helpful for me. I was actually thinking earlier today that I should take the lame one I never think of off until I have time to flesh it out. But I do like the concept, and appreciate your thoughts on the subject. Thanks for sharing!

By: Laurie Busch

Laurie Busch — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:21:35 +0000

Hi there, awesome blog, just want to ask you what spam program you have on your site for cleaning up comments since I get lots on my site.

By: autom

autom — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:04:54 +0000

thanks Joseph! i thought you would appreciate the reference to the notion of measuring influence..am now collecting my thoughts on #wave and may need you and Charlotte to help refresh my memory..thanks for stopping by! thumbs up : )

By: Joseph Fiore

Joseph Fiore — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:53:04 +0000

Autom, a great topic - thanks for advancing it. I have found lists to work well with our Twitter profile. I’ve observed instances where followers find value in adding us to lists of monitoring vendors, and others who find value in our tweets. Admittedly, I don’t find myself DM’ing as much, and you certainly raise enough compelling reasons to mix it up to build organic trust.

Joseph
@RepuTrack

By: Twitter Trackbacks for autom8 » Twitter Lists: courtesy, classification, trust [iabc.com] on Topsy.com

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:11:50 +0000

[…] autom8 » Twitter Lists: courtesy, classification, trust autom.x.iabc.com/2010/01/24/twitter-lists-courtesy-classification-trust – view page – cached Reflections on the social media revolution […]